<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marinplasticsurgeryblog.com &#187; Botox and Injectable Dermal Fillers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/category/botox-and-injectable-dermal-fillers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 05:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Plastic Surgery Taxation Discussed By Terry L. Hand, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/2009/09/plastic-surgery-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/2009/09/plastic-surgery-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Terry Hand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Botox and Injectable Dermal Fillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tummy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sort of plastic surgery taxation has been tried in several states unsuccessfully already.  Currently only New Jersey still has a tax on cosmetic surgery and even the legislator that wrote the original bill has recommended canceling it.  Why you ask?  The  amount collected  by the state of New Jersey was 75% off the targeted amount.  Patients were crossing into nearby states to take advantage of nontaxable procedures.  The question of defining what was or was not a cosmetic surgery procedure became blurry.  Several examples of that are:  the woman that had a breast reconstruction requiring breast implants and required revisions,  the massive weight loss patient that required a tummy tuck to remove a large abdominal pannice so that she could go on with a normal life and seek employment or the elderly patient with an upper eyelid fold that partially obscurred vision.  I would guess that most of us have dealt with an insurance company that has ruled a medical procedure unnecessary.  Imagine the same group of uninformed individuals deciding on taxation.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-267" title="tax" src="http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/tax.jpg" alt="tax" width="257" height="320" />Help me understand this.  I choose to have a Botox injection.  You choose to have your hair cut and colored.  I save <span id="more-231"></span><!--more-->my discretionary income for my procedure as do you.  You don&#8217;t care if I have Botox and I don&#8217;t care if you color your hair.  Why should the government consider penalizing either of us for making the  choice of either option to blow our dollars?  Why would <a title="Botox" href="http://www.botoxcosmetic.com" target="_self">Botox</a> be considered any more of a vanity procedure than haircare?  Are either of them necessary?  The answer to all of these questions is no.  Do they both make an individual feel better about the way she looks?  Absolutely.  So since when is it appropriate to judge a choice that hurts no one, does not influence the nations financial picture in the least and greatly contributes to the economy when looking at discretionary spending.</p>
<p>I have 2 daughters that are recent college graduates and currently exploring the difficult job market.   I  have had many discussions with both regarding the interview process and the image that is best received by an employer.  Most potential employers would expect an applicant to have a stylish haircut,  neat and well-tended nails,  pressed and freshly laudered clothing, etc.  Should we begin taxing all of these services since they could be construed as unnecessary and a reflection of vanity?  Nope.  The reality of plastic surgery and noninvasive cosmetic procedures is that most people that utilize the different options are like you and I.  They are middle class, responsible with their spending and view these procedures as maintenance.  Of course,  there will always be a few sensational bizarros like Michael Jackson and the Octomom  to tweak  negativity amongst  those that would never do any of these procedures anyway.  Then again, there are many of our politicos that I have noticed move almost nothing on their faces during interviews.</p>
<p>This sort of plastic surgery taxation has been tried in several states unsuccessfully already.  Currently only New Jersey still has a tax on cosmetic surgery and even the legislator that wrote the original bill has recommended canceling it.  Why you ask?  The  amount collected  by the state of New Jersey was 75% off the targeted amount.  Patients were crossing into nearby states to take advantage of nontaxable procedures.  The question of defining what was or was not a cosmetic surgery procedure became blurry.  Several examples of that are:  the woman that had a breast reconstruction requiring breast implants and required revisions,  the massive weight loss patient that required a tummy tuck to remove a large abdominal panice so that she could go on with a normal life and seek employment or the elderly patient with an upper eyelid fold that partially obscured vision.  I would guess that most of us have dealt with an insurance company that has ruled a medical procedure unnecessary.  Imagine the same group of uninformed individuals deciding on taxation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/2009/09/plastic-surgery-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liquid Facelift Vs. Marin County Cosmetic Surgery</title>
		<link>http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/2009/02/liquid-facelift-vs-marin-county-cosmetic-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/2009/02/liquid-facelift-vs-marin-county-cosmetic-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Terry Hand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Botox and Injectable Dermal Fillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faceift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye lift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facelift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injectable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiesse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restylane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "liquid Lift", a combination of injectable dermal fillers and Botox is a valuable adjunct to facial cosmetic surgery for many patients.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp">&#8220;To fill or not to fill?&#8221; seems to be a question that I answer often these days.  The economy being the way it is for most of us,  has necessitated that patients be very savvy in their choices of cosmetic procedures.  Most of you have heard the term  &#8220;liquid facelift&#8221;.  A &#8220; <a title="Marin County Liquid Facelift" href="htthttp://www.thandmd.com/restylane.htmp://">liquid facelift</a>&#8220;   very simply is the usage of injectable dermal fillers and <a title="Botox in the Bay Area" href="http://www.thandmd.com/botox.html" target="_self">Botox</a> combined, with the intention of  filling in wrinkles and smoothing pleated muscles in various areas of the face.  I have patients that I think this procedure in moderation works well for, but I also see a whole group of individuals that would be better served by an appropriate surgical procedure that would provide long term correction.</div>
<p>Let me give you an example,  the patient below needed a <a title="Facelift in Marin County" href="hhttp://www.thandmd.com/face-lift.htmlttp://">facelift</a> and eyelid lift.  Her neck had lost definition, her jowl lines were softened and her midface was sagging.  To have merely injected dermal fillers and Botox into her face would have created relaxed muscles in the areas that were already relaxed and a puffiness to her face that did not match her distinctive look.  She was better served by performing a facelift and an eyelid lift, followed by strategically utilizing  injectable dermal fillers, Radiesse and <a title="Restylane" href="http://www.restylaneusa.com" target="_blank">Restylane</a>, to correct the nasolabial lines.  Her facial muscles were tightened, her midface was lifted with her eyelid lift, her neckline redefined and the extra skin from her face and eyelids were removed.  No Botox was used on this patient.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-110 aligncenter" title="facelift-photos-13" src="http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/facelift-photos-13.jpg" alt="facelift-photos-13" width="200" height="116" /></p>
<p>The next patient was an excellent candidate for Botox and injectable dermal fillers, but again, they were used as an adjunct to cosmetic surgery.  Before surgery, this patient had lower lid puffiness and upper lid drooping that was correctable only by an eye lift.  She had midface laxity and her nasolabial lines were prominent,  as were the lines between her brows.  Botox was  utilized to weaken her brow lines and the the lines in her crow&#8217;s feet areas, and to slightly lift her brows.   Restylane was used to correct her nasolabial lines.  However, the greatest correction was seen following her upper and lower <a title="Eyelid lift in San Francisco Bay Area" href="http://www.thandmd.com/bleph.html" target="_self">eyelid lift</a>.  At that time, extra skin and muscle were removed, the malar fat pads (over the cheekbones) were repositioned and the midface was lifted.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-116" title="eyelid-lift-jody" src="http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/eyelid-lift-jody.jpg" alt="eyelid-lift-jody" width="200" height="123" /></p>
<p>There are certainly times when the physical anatomy of the face or financial choices make the usage of Botox and injectable dermal fillers, without cosmetic surgery, a wonderful choice.  My concern is that patients need to be informed of all methods, tried and true, that may be of benefit  for the cosmetic concerns that they are trying to solve.  Dermal fillers and Botox are great temporary solutions, but when used in great quantities to avoid a surgical solution, their costs can be equally as daunting.</p>
<p>My recommendation:  By all means utilize these valuable nonsurgical solutions, however, an informed plastic surgeon can assist you in providing a reality based plan for your short-term and long-term goals.  At my <a href="http://www.thandmd.com" target="_self">Marin County plastic surgery</a> practice, I evaluate every patient&#8217;s individual needs so that you understand all of your options prior to treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marinplasticsurgeryblog.com/2009/02/liquid-facelift-vs-marin-county-cosmetic-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
